Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15680 of 2010 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar son of Ghurpat Ram , resident of village - Bharari Kala, P.S.- Chand, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna
2. Project Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission, Bihar, Patna
3. District Welfare Officer, Bhabhua, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua)
4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
5. Block Development Officer, Chand, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil For the Respondent/s : AC to A.A.G. No. 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-05-2017
1. Heard Sri Kumar Sunil, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to A.A.G. No. 15.
2. The petitioner, has approached this Court invoking its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to direct the respondents to issue appointment letter in his favour for the post of "Vikash Mitra" pursuant to selection process, which was initiated in the year 2010.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the facts disclosed in the counter affidavit accepts that after selection process initiated in the year 2010 subsequent selection processes were initiated and in the fifth phase of selection process one another person, namely Sri Dhananjay Kumar Kaushal has
Patna High Court CWJC No.15680 of 2010 (3) dt.16-05-2017 2/2 already been selected.
4. Considering the fact that the present writ petition was filed in relation to selection process initiated in the year 2010 and thereafter, number of selection processes were initiated and finally, one person has already been appointed, who has not been impleaded in the present writ petition, in view of changed circumstances, it would be difficult for this Court to pass any positive order in the writ petition.
5. Accordingly , the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U