Patna High CourtCR. MISC./844/2017bail granted

Siman Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.844 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2016 Thana -GHORASAHAN District- EAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Siman Manjhi Son of Mokhtar Manjhi Resident of Village- Govindpur Musai , Police Station- Jitna (Ghorashan), District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

It has been submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation is of recovery of 30 bottles of Nepali liquor, the petitioner has remained in judicial custody for seven months and the petitioner has clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the State does not controvert the aforesaid submissions.

Having heard both sides, in view of the period of custody and the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.844 of 2017 (2) dt.02-02-2017 Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Ghorasahan (Jitna) P.S. Case No. 220 of 2016 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of the trial and make himself available as and when required by the court below and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Rishi/- U T