Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41362/2016bail granted

Suresh Prasad Sah @ Suresh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-04Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41362 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2016 Thana -SANHOLA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Suresh Prasad Sah @ Suresh Sah, Son of Late Nathan Sah Resident of Village Nayagaon, Shyampur, P.S. Munger, District Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2016 in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 64 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 307, 302, 120B, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event even according to the FIR the petitioner's son Rakesh Sah is the assailant and no overt act whatsoever has been imputed to the petitioner who claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 64 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41362 of 2016 (2) dt.04-10-2016 offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T