Amit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19814 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2018 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== AMIT YADAV, son of Sanjay Kumar Singh, resident of village- Laharabad, P.S. Piro, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Ataul Haque For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 258 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A/26 of the Arms Act.

Informant is a police officer has alleged that from possession of petitioner one loaded pistol and two cartridges in magazine were recovered. Petitioner has criminal antecedent and is in accused in six cases.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. However, after one year of custody the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19814 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 would be enlarged on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhojpur at Arrah, in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 258 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T