Samridhi Mahila Kalyan Samiti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3215 of 2014 =========================================================== Samridhi Mahila Kalyan Samiti .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. VAIDEHI RAMAN PRASAD SINGH For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG-2 D.K.SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to make payment of the amount claimed by the petitioner for giving vocational training to the persons belonging to below poverty line along with the interest.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that despite being entitle to the amount as claimed by the petitioner, only partial payment Rs. 3, 00,000/- has been made for purchasing the row material leaving a considerable amount outstanding to be paid.
4. In the above view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a Consent of the petitioner, granting him liberty to approach the respondent Municipal Commissioner Bhagalpur (respondent no.4) with a fresh representation for redresses of his
Patna High Court CWJC No.3215 of 2014 dt.05-01-2016 2/2 grievance. If any such representation is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, ensuring payment to the extent found due to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving the petitioner's representation. Any delay in payment of the admitted amount beyond the stipulated period as stated above, shall entitle the petitioner to receive payment together with simple interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the admitted dues calculated from the date when the amount became due till the date of its actual payment. In case the petitioner's claim is found inadmissible, whether whole or in part, the petitioner's representation shall be disposed of by a speaking order in that regard.
It is made clear that this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. (Vikash Jain, J) M.Rahman/- U T