Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71767/2018bail granted

Nitesh Raj @ Vicky v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-07Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.71767 of 2018 Arising out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2018 Thana- Kanti Tharmal Power DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Nitesh Raj @ Vicky, S/o Akhileshwar Kumar @ Akhileshwar Rai, R/o Village Shanti Vihar Colony, Gram Chowk, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2018 The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kanti P.S.Case No. 500 of 2018 registered under Sections 399,402,413 and 414 of the Indian penal Code and 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation, as per the FIR, is that police raided the place of occurrence and arrested nine accused persons and arms and cartridges from them. It is alleged that petitioner succeeded in fleeing away from there and it appears that petitioner is accused in two other cases.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner though he is accused in two other cases, but in those cases, he is on bail and in the present case, petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71767 of 2018(2) dt.07-12-2018 2/2 21.08.2018.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 500 of 2018 with condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T