Golu @ Dheeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24825 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2022 Thana- NARAINPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Golu @ Dheeraj Kumar Son of Mukesh Kumar Singh Resident of VillageRam Dihal Tola, Police Station- Chandi in the district of Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, motorcycle borne three miscreants intercepted the informant and looted his mobile, identify proofs and Rs. 44,996/- cash on pistol point.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name was transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Indal Kumar, before police. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Neither the petitioner put on TIP nor any incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24825 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 article has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 26.2.2023. Moreover, similarly situated coaccused namely, Pankaj Kumar has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dt. 20.4.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10014 of 2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioner has got eleven criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail after framing of charge, if not framed in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 20922 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T