Prakash Goswami v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22408 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2021 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna ====================================================== PRAKASH GOSWAMI S/o Ashok Goswami R/o Mohalla- Rajabazar Majar Gali, Pillar No.76 in the house of Dhan Singh, P.S.- Shastrinagar, DistrictPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Paswan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 356, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is to have snatched away the mobile of the informant, however, on chase, he was apprehended by the police and looted mobile was recovered from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 19.07.2021.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22408 of 2022(2) dt.18-07-2022 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 268/2021 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T