Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48900/2016bail granted

Rinku Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-10Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48900 of 2016 (3) dt.10-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48900 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -314 Year- 2015 Thana -NAUTAN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Rinku Ram, son of Late Indradeo Ram, resident of Village- Harijan Toli (Chhawani), P.S. Manuapul, District- West Champara. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2016 in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 314 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and the accusations themselves are highly improbable in nature. In any event, suspicion has been raised merely against co-accused Deepak Ram whose scarf is alleged to have been found around the neck of the deceased. The said Deepak Ram has been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6115 of 2016.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48900 of 2016 (3) dt.10-02-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Bettiah, West Champaran , in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 314 of 2015, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T