Kodai Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7579 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2016 Thana -NANHPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Kodai Mahto, Son of Late Kailu Mahto

2. Ramu Mahto, Son of Late Narayan Mahto

3. Sitaram Mahto Son of Dorik Mahto.

4. Sujit Kumar Son of Late Ram Pratap Mahto

5. Raj Kumar Mahto, Son of Late Bihari Mahto

6. Prabhanjan Mahto, Son of ate Ram Pratap Mahto

7. Kundan Kumar, Son of Prabhanjan Mahto

8. Prince Kumar Son of Sujit Kumar All Resident of Village-Nanpur P.S. Nanpur District-Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 324, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that for a petty issue, there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides received injuries, which are simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and injuries are

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7579 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 simple in nature, let above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi, in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case no. 298 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available before the police as and when required. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T