Nagendra Nath Singh v. Shri Pratay Amrit And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4919 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21671 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Nagendra Nath Singh, Son of Late Basudeo Singh resident of Baidya Nath Mahto Marg, House No. J.K.S. D/5, Old Jakkanpur, P.S. Jakkanpur, P.O. G.P.O. District: Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Shri Pratay Amrit, Son of at present not known to this petitioner but presently posted as the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. Sri Vinod Kumar, Son of at present not known to this petitioner but presently posted as the General Manager (H.R. and Adm) Distribution Company, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. Smt. Palka Sahni, daughter of at present not known to this petitioner, presently posted as the Managing Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Bailey Road, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna.

4. Sri M.K. Ojha, Son of at present not known to this petitioner, presently posted as the Deputy General Manager (HR & Administration), South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Bailey Road, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna.

5. The State of Bihar represented through Energy Secretary Sri Pratay Amrit Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate Mr. Asif Daula Siddiqui, Advocate For the State/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, S.C.3 Mr. Arjun Prasad, A.C. to S.C. 3 For the B.S.E.B. : Mr.M.P. Jaiswal, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsels for the State and for the Bihar State Power (Holding) Company.

Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the order under contempt has since been complied with, but the petitioner has

Patna High Court MJC No.4919 of 2014 dt.15-11-2016 2/2 certain objections with regard to the calculations and he be given liberty to press the same before the opposite parties. In the aforesaid circumstances, the contempt application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file representation with regard to any defect in the calculation, which the opposite parties shall consider in accordance with law.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) Narendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 14.12.2016 Transmission Date