Vikash Paswan @ Yuvraj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20856 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2024 Thana- MAIRWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Vikash Paswan @ Yuvraj Paswan S/o Krishna Paswan R/o Village- Karchui, P.S.- Mairwa, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 03-06-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Mairwan P.S. Case no.158 of 2024, registered under sections 307, 147, 341, 342, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on the orders of Tribhuwan Tiwari, it is stated that Lakki Tiwari fired on the informant from a pistol in his hand which hit the informant in the rear portion of his head. It is further stated that Mukesh Pamdey and the petitioner also fired, however the informant was somehow saved.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No such occurrence as alleged in the F.I.R. has taken place. The manner of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20856 of 2025(2) dt.03-06-2025 2/2 occurrence is other than what has been narrated by the informant in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that the case of the petitioner stands on a better footing to that of a co-accused Lakki Tiwari who has been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure-3) passed in Cr. Misc. no.85219 of 2024. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and especially the grant of anticipatory bail to the co-accused Lakki Tiwari vide aforesaid order dated 28.2.2025, in the facts of the case it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Mairwan P.S. Case no.158 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Siwan. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T