Saban Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21359 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2018 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Saban Kumar Sahni, aged about 23 years, male, Son of Rajaram Sahni Resident of Village - Chandrahansa Dih, P.S.- Ghatho, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 354(A), 379, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Sarairanjan (Ghatho O.P.) P.S. Case No. 200 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event there is no accusation of assault or theft whatsoever against the petitioner who claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21359 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateVI, Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan (Ghatho O.P.) P.S. Case No. 200 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T