← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3061/2015dfd for non appearance

Smt. Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-09Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3061 of 2015 ====================================================== Smt. Shanti Devi, Wife of Ranjeet Singh, R/o Balwapar, P.S.- Harnaut, District - Nalanda. At present resident of Srichandpur, P.O. + P.S.- Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Nalanda.

2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Biharsharif Nalanda.

3. Anchal Adhikari, Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

4. Smt. Rinku Devi, Wife of Jitendra Kumar, Son of Sadhu Saran Singh, R/o Keshochak, P.O. + P.S.- Hilsa, District - Nalanda. At present resident of village - Srichandpur, P.O. + P.S.- Harnaut, District - Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent nos.1to3 : Mr. Anirban Kundu, SC-24 For the Respondent no.4 : Mr.Shakti Suman Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2017 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on her behalf is printed in the daily cause list.

The learned SC-24 appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4, on the other hand, submit that the claims of mutation raised on behalf of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question have been rejected by the original authority as also the appellate authority and, therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Arvind/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) U