← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23304/2022dismissed

Golu Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-11Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23304 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2020 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== GOLU KUMAR @ RITESH KUMAR S/o Ramashish Singh R/o villageSihma-Barari, P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

This is the second attempt of the petitioner to approach before this Court for grant of bail. Earlier, vide detailed order dated 10.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 9491 of 2021, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected with a liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23304 of 2022(2) dt.11-05-2022 2/2 case. It is further submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. He further submitted that similarly situated co-accused has been enlarged on bail vide Annexure-4.

Considering the fact that earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected with a liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge but up till now charge has not been framed.

In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby once again rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T