Ravi Ranjan Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8927 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.
Ravi Ranjan Kumar Pandey Son of Lalan Pandey Resident of VillageGowas Bishunpur, Police Station- Kutumba, District- Aurangabad. 2.
Rajni Rajak Wife of Sanjay Kumar Rajak Resident of Village- Shahpur Devisthan, Police Station- Town Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 3.
Priyanka Kumari Wife of Dilip Kumar Resident of Nabinagar Ghanta, Police Station- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3.
The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad.
5.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad. 6.
The District Supply Officer, Aurangabad.
7.
The District Cooperative Officer, Aurangabad. 8.
The District Welfare Officer, Aurangabad.
9.
The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Aurangabad.
10.
Sulochana Kumari Wife of Rakesh Kumar Resident of Village- Chankap, Police Station- Kutumba, District- Aurangabad. 11.
Puja Gupta Daughter of Chandradeo Sao Resident of Village- Shahpur Road, Police Station- Town Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 12.
Dinanath Kumar Gupta Son of Nand Kumar Gupta Resident of VillageNabinagar Road, Police Station- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Santosh Kumar Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.S. Raza Ahmad (AAG5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025
1. It is reported by the Learned counsel for the petitioners that the entire process of PDS dealership has been completed. Therefore, he
Patna High Court CWJC No.8927 of 2019(4) dt.22-09-2025 2/2 seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent orders.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Accordingly, the Writ petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Amandeep/- U