Upendra Mehta And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.17931 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Upendra Mehta Son of Late Jagdeo Mehta,
2. Pintu Mehta, Son of Upendra Mehta,
3. Shikendra Mehta, Son of Mojilal Mehta,
4. Sanichari Devi, Wife of Shikendra Mehta,
5. Lalita Devi, Wife of Upendra Mehta, All residents of Village- Tulsibari, P.S.- Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), District- Madhepura.
6. Sulekha Devi, Wife of Ajay Mehta, Resident of Village- Patori, Police Station- Singheshwar, District- Madhepura.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph-1 of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mahila (Madhepura) P.S. Case No. 08 of 2016, registered under Sections 498(A), 494, 323, , 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioners are in-laws of the informant and the allegation is under Sections 498(A), and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17931 of 2017 (2) dt.27-04-2017 2/2 who are in-laws of the informant and the allegations are general and omnibus.
Heard learned Additional P.P. also. Learned A.P.P. also could not controvert the aforesaid submission. Having heard both sides and in view of the aforesaid facts, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Mahila (Madhepura) P.S. Case No. 08 of 2016, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further conditions that the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation and make themselves available before the police as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates, the prosecution shall be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds and further petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) BTiwary/- U T