Rajnandan Prasad And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44260 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -240 Year- 2012 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Rajnandan Prasad, son of late Prabhu Prasad,

2. Sunil Kumar, son of Rajnandan Prasad, both are resident of villageChhaparatar, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ranjit Kumar, son of Suresh Prasad, R/o Village- Chhaperatar, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhim Sen Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 13-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 364, 342, 506 Indian Penal Code.

Considering the facts of the case and fair antecedents of the Petitioners, it is ordered that in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No.240-C of 2012, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/- (five

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44260 of 2015 (2) dt.13-10-2015 2/2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Barh, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the Petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iv) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.