Mukesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40880 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2015 Thana -DESARI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Mukesh Rai S/o Harendra Rai resident of Village- Rampur Kichari, P.S.- Desari, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-10-2016 Heard Sri Anirudh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ram Anurag Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

The sole petitioner, the husband of the deceased has prayed for grant of bail in Desari P.S. Case No. 185 of 2015 registered for the offence under Section 304(B)/201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the funeral informant and other family members of the deceased participated and subsequently the present F.I.R. was lodged, however learned Additional Public Prosecutor, by way of referring to the facts disclosed in the case diary which was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40880 of 2016 (3) dt.25-10-2016 2/2 earlier received in this case, submits that there is sufficient material to show that petitioner being husband was directly involved in the case. Death of the deceased had occurred due to burn injury . It is evident that dead body was not sent for post mortem examination.

Considering the facts and circumstances particularly the fact that petitioner was the husband, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T