Patna High CourtL.P.A/2020/2015dismissed

Subodh Kant v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2020 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13550 of 2012 =========================================================== Subodh Kant, son of Braj Nandan Prasad, resident of Village - Saril Chak, P.O. + P.S. + District - Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner- Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Tourism Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

5. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, Patna.

6. Sharat Chandra, son of Dwarika Prasad Singh, Having Roll No.- 000249, Against Advt. No. - 1707/2007, C/o Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

.... .... Respondents-Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar, AC to G.P.11 For the BSSC : Mr. K. K. Upadhyay, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 04-04-2017 Re.: Interlocutory Application No.8968 of 2015 The delay in filing of this Appeal is condoned. Re.: Letters Patent Appeal No. 2020 of 2015 Admittedly, the petitioner did not produce the requisite certificate about his social status at the time of submitting his application form in pursuant to the advertisement wherein it is clearly

Patna High Court LPA No.2020 of 2015 dt.04-04-2017 2/2 stipulated that all certificates and testimonials should be submitted along with the application. That apart, the certificate produced at the time of interview was not by the authorized officer and was not tenable in law. The learned Writ Court taking note of the aforesaid having dismissed the writ petition has not committed any error in doing so. The Appeal is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR N. A. F. R.

CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 08.04.2017 Transmission Date