Rupam Devi @ Rupa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17951 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -383 Year- 2016 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Rupam Devi @ Rupa Kumari Wife of Naresh Bhagat, Resident of VillageBihat, Jagir, Police Station- Barauni, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hare Krishna Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Barauni (F.C.I.) P.S. Case No. 383 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 366(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R. the case is under Section 366(B) of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping of the daughter of the informant. However, against this petitioner there is allegation that when the informant went to enquire about her daughter, she was misbehaved by the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that other than this allegation that the informant was misbehaved by the petitioner, there is nothing against the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17951 of 2017 (2) dt.27-04-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also Having heard both sides and in view of such circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Barauni (F.C.I.) P.S. Case No. 383 of 2016, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with further conditions that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court and it is further directed that after investigation, if any serious materials come against the petitioner, the prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail bond of the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) BTiwary/- U T