Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20902/2020dismissed

Sabir Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-13Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20902 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2019 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== SABIR KHAN Son of Wajul Haque Khan Resident of Village-Virta Tola Dhaka, P.S.-Dhaka, District-East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. J.K.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-10-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately upon resumption of normal physical functioning of the Court, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 22.06.2019, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 631 of 2019, arising out of Dhaka P.S. Case No.210 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 326, 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, having earlier been rejected by order dated 20.12.2019 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 84875

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20902 of 2020(4) dt.13-10-2020 2/2 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the murder of the informant's husband. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence, and claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP, this Court is not inclined to take a different view of the matter from the earlier order dated 20.12.2019 aforesaid. The petition stands dismissed.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U