Deepak Koiri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22484 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== DEEPAK KOIRI Son of Dudhnath Koiri @ Dudhnath Singh Resident of Village - Bijhaura, P.s.- Itarhi in the Distt.- of Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. His name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confession made by one Rakesh Kumar Gupta. Nothing was recovered from the possession of petitioner. No TIP was done. Petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2021. Charge sheet has already been submitted.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22484 of 2022(2) dt.18-07-2022 2/2 upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No. 13, Buxar, in connection with Buxar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 168 of 2021, subject to conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/rajivU