Laddu @ Raghib Azad @ Ragib Aazad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22515 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2022 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

LADDU @ RAGHIB AZAD @ RAGIB AAZAD Son of Naiyyar @ Md. Naiyyar Resident of Village - Nauwagachi Lakhnare, P.s.- Jalalgarh, Distt.- Purnea.

2.

Kaisar @ Md. Kaisar Alam Son of Md. Akbal Resident of Village - Nauwagachi Lakhnare, P.s.- Jalalgarh, Distt.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Jalalgarh P.S. case No. 11 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 363, 365, 384, 386, 506 & 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners in association of other co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22515 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 is said to have kidnapped the informant, tied him with iron rope and locked in a room. The reason behind the occurrence is said to be money dispute.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioners is serious in nature, hence they do not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected. However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T