← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19799/2019dismissed

Tanveer Ekbal v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19799 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2015 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== TANVEER EKBAL Son of Abdul Rab Nishtar Resident of Mirgayas Chak, Near Alambila, P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Shahnawaz Ali For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2019 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Complaint Case No.301 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of subjecting his wife to cruelty for demand of Car and ousted her from the house and retaining all her ornaments.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep her with dignity and care and he has stated so in para 6 of the petition . Heard learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel for the O.P.no.2 (wife), who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner has already married with another

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19799 of 2019(4) dt.19-06-2019 2/2 girl and filed a divorce petition at Bombay, which was later on dismissed and he has admitted on deposition in C.R.Case No.946 of 2017 that he has married with another lady, as such the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, hence the provisional bail granted to the petitioner, vide order dated 4.4.2019 is recalled and the petitioner is directed to surrender and pray for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit.

With the above direction, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T