Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22246 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2021 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

BITTU KUMAR SON OF SHIVAJI BHAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMIRJAPUR, P.S- HATHUWA, DIST- GOPALGANJ 2.

FUL KUMARI DEVI D/O SHIVAJI BHAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMIRJAPUR, P.S- HATHUWA, DIST- GOPALGANJ 3.

URMILA DEVI W/O SHIVJI BHAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMIRJAPUR, P.S- HATHUWA, DIST- GOPALGANJ 4.

DHENUKDHARI BHAGAT @ DHANUSHADHARI SINGH SON OF NOT GIVEN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRJAPUR, P.S- HATHUWA, DIST- GOPALGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 1 and 4.

Permission is accorded.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22246 of 2022(2) dt.03-11-2022 2/3 The informant alleges that deceased was married to Ful Kumari Dev about five years ago and the deceased had gone to his Sasural for bringing his wife back after Bidai but was killed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner No. 2 and 3 are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioner no. 2 is Sister of the wife of the deceased and petitioner no. 3 is mother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel next submits that informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and it absolutely does not stand to reason that as to why the petitioner would have killed their own son-in-law with whom the daughter of petitioner no. 3 was married.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22246 of 2022(2) dt.03-11-2022 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hathuwa P.S. Case No. 274 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T