Mithun Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29492 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2023 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Mithun Paswan S/o Sigul Paswan R/o vill - Belmohan, P.S - Phulparas, Distt. - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyaya, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023, corresponding to G.R. No. 116/2023 dated 25.01.2023, registered for the offence under Sections 395 & 397 Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the prosecution case, dacoity was committed by unknown criminals and when the villagers and police came, they threw bombs on the villagers and police also. In the dacoity, gold and silver ornaments were looted. The petitioner has given self incuplatory statement before the police confessing his guilt. The petitioner is accused in 11 serious cases which includes cases of dacoity, murder etc. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29492 of 2024(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has been made accused on the basis of suspicion. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. The petitioner has eleven criminal antecedents and he is in jail since 12.09.2023.

5.

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of the bail of the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and the serious allegation and also eleven criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Accordingly, the application of the petitioner for grant of regular bail is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T