Dilip Yadav @ Dilip Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Cr. Misc. No. 20988 of 2020 ====================================================== Dilip Yadav @ Dilip Kumar Yadav, son of Late Ino Yadav, Resident of Musechakl, Ward No. 1, Sahebpur-Kamal, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .. ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. S.K.Lal, Advocate Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Respondent State:

Smt. Reena Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2020 Heard Mr. S.K.Lal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Smt. Reena Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State of Bihar. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Sahebpur-Kamal P.S. Case No. 18 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20 and 22 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Considering the fact that allegedly from the petitioner's house, the police recovered ganja and that the petitioner has criminal antecedent in following cases : - (i) Sahebpur-Kamal P.S. Case No. 319 of 2017 for offences under Sections 437, 459, 341, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. (ii) Dandari P.S. Case No. 13 of 2018 for offences

under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, and (iii) Sahebpur-Kamal P.S. Case No. 329 of 2018 for offences under Section 25(1-B)a, 25(1-AA), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, I am not inclined to grant him privilege of anticipatory bail.

This application is accordingly rejected.

The petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered by the learned Court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail.

It is indicated that defect, if any, shall be removed within two months.

Since there is a lock down, the Court has considered it appropriate to adopt following procedure for communication of the present order :- (i) The order, which has been dictated during the course of the proceedings of virtual Court, shall be communicated to me on my e-mail I.D. by the Secretary. (ii) The corrected copy of the order shall be transmitted by me from my e-mail I.D. to the Secretary, which

shall be treated to be the authentic copy of the order passed by this Court today in the present proceeding.

(iii) Hard copy of the order, duly signed by me, shall be preserved in my residential-office for documentation and future use, if any.

(iv) Let a copy of the order be communicated to the learned Court below through e-mail or any other appropriate electronic mode by the Registry.

Let steps be taken by the Registry for uploading of the present order without compromising with the norms of social distancing.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U T