Shubham Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.72748 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2018 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== Shubham Kumar, Son of Shree Arun Kumar Lal, Resident of MohallaPathar Ki Masid, Tekari Road, Sampatchak, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 500 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 274, 275, 276, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27(c), 28(a), 27(b)(ii) and 27(d) of the Drug and Cosmetics Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of sample of counterfeit drugs.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is paid employee of the shop from where the recovery was made. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 31.04.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72748 of 2018(2) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 500 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U