Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32313 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4023 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Ranjan Kumar Son Of Late Ram Chandra Ram.

2.

Suraj Devi Wife Of Ranjan Kumar both R/O Mohalla- Mithapur, B-Area, F.C.I. Gali Purandarpur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna (BIHAR). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sonam Kumari Daughter Of Lal Babu Prasad R/O Village- Devnagar, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners in association of their family members used to torture the complainant for non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32313 of 2021(4) dt.21-02-2022 2/2 implicated in this case. He submits that petitioners are the inlaws of the complainant. He submits that complaint case No. 4023 (c) of 2019 has been compromised between the parties and husband of the complainant namely Ravi Kumar has already been granted bail by the learned court below on 07.08.2021. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 4023(c) of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T