Laal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22751 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2018 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== LAAL SINGH Son of Late Kapileshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Sirsiya, Hanumanganj, Tola Mahthawa, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Bhargama, DistrictAraria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 283 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 447, 307, 379, 504, 354 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the reading of the First Information Report it would appear that there are allegations of giving of Farsa blow on the chest of the informant against two accused persons namely Laal Singh and Sanjay Singh but from the injury report which is available with the case diary it would appear that only one simple injury has been found on the chest of the informant. So far as the brother of the informant is concerned, had received one injury on his left

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22751 of 2019(3) dt.18-07-2019 2/2 hand elbow that is also simple in nature. Learned counsel, therefore, submits that apparently the allegations that two persons were giving Farsa blow on the chest of the informant is false and fabricated and there are chances of the false implication of this petitioner.

Learned APP is present, however, he does not dispute the factual position appearing from the injury report. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State, in the nature of the allegations which is not getting corroborated from the injury report, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who is not having any criminal antecedent. Let the petitioner above named, in case of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 283 of 2018, be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ved/vats U