Arun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55495 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2016 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Arun Yadav, Son of Umesh Yadav, Resident of Mohalla-Said Nagar Abhanda, P.S. Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 14.8.2016 in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 220 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and later on his name transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused in which he has also named some other accused persons also and out of which one co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 35934 of 2016 dated 20.8.2016. The petitioner remained in custody for more than five months. From the bail petition, it transpires that there are three more cases in which the petitioner is accused. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard the learned counsel for both side and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55495 of 2016 (3) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 considering the fact that there is nothing against the petitioner except that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement of co-accused, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriasarai P.S.Case No. 220 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U