← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53942/2016bail granted

Brajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53942 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHESHKHUNT District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Brajesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhubneshwar Sah Resident of VillageSatanpatti, P.S. Ratanpur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kunwar Ajit Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 19.10.2016 in connection with Maheshkut P.S. Case No. 91 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation against the petitioner that he along with some other persons has taken money from the informant on the pretext of providing him Government Job, however during investigation of case nothing has come against the petitioner and he has been in judicial custody since 19.10.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the period of custody and also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53942 of 2016 (3) dt.25-01-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Khagaria, in connection with Maheshkut P.S. Case No. 91 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U