← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1061/2024disposed

Kumar Sanu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-18Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1061 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9870 of 2018 ====================================================== Kumar Sanu Son of Anchu Manjhi Resident of Village and Post- Birju Milki, Police Station- Harnaut, District- Nalanda, at present Tola Sevak at Primary School, Chakhmind, P.O.- Birju Milki, P.S.- Harnaut, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar represented by Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Mr. K. K. Pathak, IAS 2.

Mr. Baidya Nath Yadav, the Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Ranjan Giri, The District Programme Officer, Prarambhik, Siksha Abhiyan, Nalanda.

4.

Mr. Raj Kumar, District Education Officer, Nalanda. 5.

Mr.S. K. Prabhakar, District Programme Coordinator, District Pariyojna, Nalanda.

6.

Mr. Surendra Kumar Sinha, Block Education Officer, Harnaut, Nalanda. 7.

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Block Programme Coordinator, Harnaut, Nalanda. 8.

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Head Master, Primary School, Chakhamind, P.O. - Birju Milki, P.S. - Harnaut, Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukul Jee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Additional Advocate General 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-07-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The present contempt petition has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 18.07.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9870 of 2018.

3. A show cause on behalf of the opposite party no. 3, the District Programme Officer (Literacy), Nalanda is on record, according to which, an order has been passed communicated to

Patna High Court MJC No.1061 of 2024(3) dt.18-07-2024 2/2 the petitioner vide memo no. 133 dated 27.04.2024.

4. The claim of the petitioner has been rejected. If he so want can challenge the same in the writ petition.

5. This Court is satisfied that the order has been complied.

6. The M.J.C. No. 1061 of 2024 stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U