Ravi Ranjan Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32421 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2020 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

RAVI RANJAN KUMAR @ RAVI RANJAN SINGH Son of Sri Vijay Singh Resident of Village - Paharpura, P.S.- Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 2.

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Singh Son of Sri Yogendra Singh Resident of Village - Paharpura, P.S.- Haspura, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Haspura P.S. Case no. 238 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 448, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, several accused persons including the petitioners entered into the house of the informant and started to hurl abuse on them and on protest, they assaulted the informant resulting into his head injury. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32421 of 2021(2) dt.22-02-2022 2/2 falsely implicated in this case. Both parties are agnates as well as next door neighbours. There is land dispute. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against them. Both parties have received injuries in alleged occurrence. They have got no criminal antecedent. The matter relates to civil dispute. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail and submitted that four injuries were sustained by the injured out of which one in grievous in nature. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that it is not clear that who has inflicted the head injury, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Haspura P.S. Case no. 238 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Aurangabad at Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U