Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33439/2021dismissed

Mahendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33439 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2020 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

MAHENDRA PRASAD Son of Aditya Mahto Resident of Village - Adarkichak Dhibar Tola, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. 2.

Siwan Kumar @ Siwan Kumar Verma Son of Jagdish Mahto Resident of Village - Adarkichak Dhibar Tola, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. 3.

Bipin Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Son of Rajendra Prasad Resident of Village - Adarkichak Dhibar Tola, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. 4.

Ramjit Prasad Son of Musafir Mahto Resident of Village - Adarkichak Dhibar Tola, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. 5.

Chetan Prasad @ Chetan Kumar Son of Musafir Prasad Resident of Village - Adarkichak Dhibar Tola, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. 6.

Indesh Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of Village - Adarkichak Dhibar Tola, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Informant. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State is also present.

The petitioners pray for grant of anticipatory bail in Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2020 registered for the offence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33439 of 2021(2) dt.09-02-2022 2/2 punishable under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/324/325/326/ 307/302/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners are the assailants of the deceased. The other accused persons armed with various deadly weapons have assaulted the deceased which resulted in the death of one person who sustained grievous injuries.

However, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

Under the facts and circumstances, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T