Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50190/2013dismissed

Rudradhar Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-01Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50190 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2005 Thana -BIHIYA District- BHOJPUR ===========================================================

1. Rudradhar Tiwary Son Of Late Singhashan Tiwary Resident Of Village - Sundarpur, Barja, P.S- Bihia, District - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Barmeshwar Tiwary

3. Bachakan Tiwary both sons of Late Ram Bilash Tiwary

4. Mahesh Tiwary

5. Mahendra Tiwary both sons of Late Yadubansh Tiwary, all Resident Of Village - Sundarpur, Barja, P.S- Bihia, District - Bhojpur

6. Moan Tiwary Son Of Shyamlal Tiwary

7. Jgarnath Tiwary Son Of Late Jagdeo Tiwary

8. Mritunjay Tiwary Son Of Late Barmeshwar Tiwary

9. Santosh Tiwary Son Of Baliram Tiwary

10. Santosh @ Bipul Tiwary Son Of Lalan Tiwary

11. Bishwamitra Tiwary Son Of Bhuwar Tiwary

12. Ashok Tiwary Son Of Jai Prakash Tiwary

13. Dhanji Tiwary Son Of Mahesh Tiwary

14. Punit Tiwary Son Of Charitra Tiwary

15. Maya Shankar Tiwary @ Rukhani Tiwary Son Of Shyam Bihari Tiwary

16. Alok Tiwary Son Of Rajendra Tiwary, all Resident Of Village - Sundarpur, Barja, P.S- Bihia, District - Bhojpur .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-03-2016 The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 28.9.2013 passed by the court of Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge 5th, Bhojpur, Ara in Sessions Trial No.644 of 2007, by which he has rejected the petition filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. On going through the impugned order, I find that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50190 of 2013 dt.01-03-2016 2/2 Trial Court looked into the records of the case and considered that additional accused be not examined under Section 319 Cr.P.C. showing full application of mind.

Hence, I find no merit in the application. The same is dismissed.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T