Rajnath Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31370 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-428 Year-2018 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

RAJNATH RAM SON OF LATE KUMAR RAM R/O VILLAGESAMAHUTI, P.S.- DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM) 2.

AMAKA RAM SON OF RAJNATH RAM R/O VILLAGE- SAMAHUTI, P.S.- DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM) 3.

AJAY RAM SON OF RAJNATH RAM R/O VILLAGE- SAMAHUTI, P.S.- DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS (SASARAM) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kumar Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is a case of assault and also the case of shot fire

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31370 of 2021(2) dt.18-02-2022 2/2 upon the informant by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in this case the shot fire did not hit to anyone. He further submits that the compromise has been held between the parties which is annexed as Annexure-2 to the present petition.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-7, Rohtas Sasaram in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 428 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T