← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10182/2019disposed

Subhash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-07Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10182 of 2019 ====================================================== Subhash Kumar Son of Late Mayanand Yadav R/o Village-Chandaur Purvi, P.S. Saur Bazar, District-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Secretary Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education Saharsa 5.

The District Magistrate Supaul 6.

The District Educational Officer Supaul 7.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Supaul 8.

The Block Education Officer Block-Pipra, District-Supaul 9.

The Block Development Officer Block-Pipra, Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arbind Kr. Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court dated 03.04.2017 passed in Civil Appeal no. 4776-4777 of 2017 (Mukesh & Another v. State of Bihar and Others), hence similar benefits be granted to the petitioner herein.

Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul shall consider the case of the petitioner in light of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10182 of 2019(2) dt.07-05-2019 2/2 aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no. 7 within a period of four weeks from today and the respondent no. 7 shall dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks thereafter and in case, the case of the petitioner is found similar to that of the Appellants of the aforesaid judgment dated 03.04.2017, similar relief would be granted to the petitioner herein within a period of six weeks therefrom. The present writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U