← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1351/2025withdrawn

Mahesh Charan Dwari @ Mahesh Charan Dwary v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1351 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2025 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Charan Dwari @ Mahesh Charan Dwary son of Late Saraswati Charan Dwari Resident of Village -Shital Mallik Road, Bilasi Town, Deoghar, P S- Deoghar District -Deoghar 2.

Nihal Kumar Thakur @ Nihal Thakur son of Late Kameshwar Thakur village- Chandra Datt Dwary path, Bilasi Town, Deoghar, Ps- Deoghar, DistDeoghar ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nikki Hembrom Wife of Late Ramesh Hembrom village- Mathura PsAnandpur, Dist- Banka ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Navjot Yeshu, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P.

For the Resp. No. 2 :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 Heard Mr. Navjot Yeshu, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 and Mr. Binay Krishna, learned Spl.P.P. for the State.

2. Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 informed this Court that the appellants had already filed Cr. Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 548 of 2025 and the appellants have been granted stay in arrest in connection with Anandpur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2025 vide order dated 11.04.2025.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1351 of 2025(2) dt.24-06-2025 2/2

3. In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is not maintainable as the appellants have no apprehension of arrest.

4. In view of the above facts, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to the appellants to file afresh appeal if they have not succeeded in the Cr. Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 548 of 2025.

5. Permission is accorded.

6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T