← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7319/2017dismissed

Madan Mohan Prasad v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2023-09-19Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7319 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2014 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Madan Mohan Prasad Son of Late Sahdeo Prasad, Resident of VillageBhatwaliya, PO- Sutihar, PS- Derni, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Dharmendra Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Deodhari Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village- Bali Tola, PO- Sutihar, PS- Derni, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Digvijay Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 08.04.2015 passed by the learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Charpa in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 116 of 2014, Tr. No. 2280 of 2016 whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. On query of the Court with regard to the stage of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that charges have been framed and trial has commenced.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes this application and submits that the present application has been filed seeking quashing of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7319 of 2017(2) dt.19-09-2023 2/2 the order dated 08.04.2015 when much water has flown and the charges have been framed and the trial has commenced, as such, the Court at this stage should refrain from entertaining this application and if the petitioner is innocent, the same shall be decided in the trial.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to entertain this application.

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T