← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14429/2015withdrawn

Shanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-10Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14429 of 2015 ====================================================== Shanti Kumari, wife of Sri Pramod Kumar, resident of Village- Sahuria, Ward No. 12, under Deohar Gram Panchayat, P.S. Andhrathari, DistrictMadhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani 4.

The Child Development Programme Officer-cum-Anchaladikari, Andharathari, District- Madhubani 5.

Smt. Sumitra Devi, wife of Raghunandan Sharma, Ward Member-cumChairman, Ward No. 12, resident of village Sahuria, P.O. Deohar (ViaBabubarhi), P.S. Andhrathari, District-Madhubani 6.

Smt. Neelam Pandey, wife of name not known, Mahila Parvekshika (Supervisor), Andhrathari Block Madhubani through Anchal Adhikaricum-Child Development Project Officer, Andharathari, DistrictMadhubani 7.

Smt. Anita Kumari, D/o Ugramohan Jha & wife of Sri Premchand Chaudhary, resident of Ward No. 12, Village-Sahuria, P.O. Deohar, P.S.Andharathari, District-Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunath Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalan Kr. Pandey, AC to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2015 Mr. Raghunath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to file a complaint before the District Programme Officer as provided under the Guidelines for selection of Anganwari Sevika.

The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14429 of 2015 (2) dt.10-09-2015 2/2 It is made clear that this Court has not applied its mind to the merits of the matter.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) S.Pandey/- U