Sonu Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32031 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2021 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== SONU RAJAK Son of Raj Kumar Rajak, Resident of Village - Guaghoghara Lalpur, P.S.- Nawada, District - Nawada, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 04 of 2021 registered for offence punishable under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25 (1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

In this case, the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent in para 3 of this bail petition. The criminal antecedent of the petitioner was called for, which has been received and annexed at flag 'X', which shows that three cases are pending against the present petitioner as follow:-

(1) Khaira P.S. Case No. 532 of 2020 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 385, 387, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 3 and 5 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32031 of 2021(3) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 Explosive Substances Act and 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Arms Act.

(2) Khaira P.S. Case No. 539 of 2020 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 385, 387, 307, 504, 379, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

(3) Khaira P.S. Case No. 33 of 2021 registered under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. The Registrar General is directed to conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action against the erring persons, who are found guilty in enquiry. The report of inquiry must come to this Court within a period of three months.

List the matter after three months.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) Mahesh/- U T