Patna High CourtCWJC/182/2015disposed

Bipin Chandra Pal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-27Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 182 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Bipin Chandra Pal, son of Deep Narayan Yadav, Resident of Village - Baijnathpur, P.S- Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa.

2. Menka Kumari, wife of Shiv Shankar Kumar, Resident of Village - Baijnathpur, P.S- Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Education Department, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

3. The District Superintendent of Education, Saharsa.

4. The Block Development Officer, Sour Bazar, Saharsa.

5. The Block Education Extension Officer , Sour Bazar Saharsa.

6. Shri Jyotish Prasad, Panchayat Secretary of Baijnathpur Panchayat, Saharsa.

7. Mukhiya, Baijnathpur Panchayat, Saharsa.

8. Dinbandhu Kumar Diwakar Son of Shri Bhupendra Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Baijnathpur, Saharsa.

9. Manju Kumari D/o Dev Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Baijnathpur, Saharsa.

10. Punam Kumari D/o Jaikrishna Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Baijnathpur, Saharsa.

11. Member District Appellate Authority, Saharsa. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GA-1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

27-01-2017 In the present writ petition, petitioners have come against an order passed by the District Teachers Appellate Authority, Saharsa. Learned State counsel informs that now, State Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal (for short "Tribunal") has already started functioning.

In view of facts and circumstances, there is no reason to keep the matter pending.

Patna High Court CWJC No.182 of 2015 (3) dt.27-01-2017 2/2 The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the Tribunal.

It goes without saying that the period consumed by the petitioners in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. from 05-01-2015 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U