← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15527/2015dismissed

Deo Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-22Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14534 of 2015 ====================================================== Bindeshwari Chaudhary Son of late Prithivi chaudhary Resident of Village -Mahisarho, P.s Mahishi, District Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education , Government of Bihar,Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director,Primary Education ,Department of Education, Government of Bihar,Patna.

4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education ,Koshi Division Saharsa. 5.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

6.

The District Programme officer(Establishment) Saharsa. 7.

The Accountant General ,Bihar Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14834 of 2015 ====================================================== Kamleshwari Prasad Yadav son of Late Domi Prasad Yadav, resident of village- Jori, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa 5.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa 6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa 7.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15527 of 2015 ====================================================== Deo Narayan Yadav, son of Late Sahdeo Yadav, resident of Village- Jori, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14534 of 2015(7) dt.22-09-2017 2/3 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 5.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

6.

The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Saharsa. 7.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14534 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Sunita Kumari AC to A.A.G. - 13 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14834 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal SC-4 Mr. Maruth Nath Roy AC to SC-4 For the Accountant General :

Mr. Bindhyachal Rai Advocate (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15527 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey A.A.G. -15 Mr. P. R. Singh AC to A.A.G. -15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Not any kind of certification obtained by a teacher showing himself to acquire training will make him entitled for matric trained scale. Rule is unambiguous in this regard. Only two years' training degree from a recognized institution can confer the status of training, which, in turn, can lead to grant of benefit of matric trained scale. Obviously, since these petitioners do not seem to have obtained training of recognized kind, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14534 of 2015(7) dt.22-09-2017 3/3 certification, which they have obtained, does not in any manner indicate that it is a two year training. It is only a one year training, which they have obtained, which cannot beget them matric trained scale.

Writ Application has no merit. It is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) skm/- U