Bhakti Singh @ Vakti Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10870 of 2017 (4) dt.25-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10870 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Bhakti Singh @ Vakti Singh, Son of Late Mukhram Singh @ Mukhlal Ram, R/o- village- Pachanuna, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Chandi Police Station Case No. 79 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner happens to be the Head Master of the school, has falsely been implicated in this case on erroneous ground by the superior authorities in order to save their skin. On bare perusal of the instant F.I.R, it is quite evident that it is not a case of defalcation of government money by the petitioner rather it is case of irregularities, committed by superior authorities i.e. District Education Officer and District Programme Officer in allotment of fund for construction of extra class room in the schools in question in connivance with one Maitrayee Consultancy. Once the fund has been allotted and disbursed to the official account of Head Master with direction to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10870 of 2017 (4) dt.25-04-2017 utilize the amount for construction of extra class room, the petitioner, being the Head Master of the school, is duty bound to comply the order of the superior authority and, accordingly, a sum of Rs.6,80,000/- on different dates has been paid by the petitioner on the pressure of D.E.O and D.P.O. concerned to the Maitrayee Consultancy for construction of extra class room. When the petitioner came to know about the irregularities committed by the superior authorities, the petitioner, showing her bona fide, filed a complaint being Complaint Case No. 1271(C) of 2016, annexure-2. No specific case of any forgery or defalcation of government exchequer is made out against this petitioner. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, IV, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Chandi Police Station Case No. 79 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T