Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27687 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2014 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav, age-40 years (M), Son of Late Bino Yadav, Resident of Village - Keshave, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 100/2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 337, 338, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The submission is that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, he is innocent and has committed no offence. From the FIR it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation. There is case and counter case and there is land dispute between the parties. The other co-accused have been granted bail in court below by learned A.D.J.- Ist, Begusarai in B.A. No. 639/18 and learned A.D.J.-V, Begusarai in B.A. No. 671/14. The petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27687 of 2019(3) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 100/2014 to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, subject to the following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T