Patna High CourtMJC/3892/2010disposed

M/S Kumar A.S.Construction v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

2017-03-02Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3892 of 2010 =========================================================== M/s Kumar A.S. Construction, Ashok Nagar Bhatt Bigha, Gaya through its Managing Partner Smt. Pramila Singh, wife of Shri Anuj Kumar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Ashok Nagar, Bhatt Bigha, Gaya Police Station- Rampur, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shri Pratya Amirit, the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Shri Baban Ram, the Engineer-in-Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Shri Deo Narayan Prasad, the Chief Engineer, National Highway, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. Shri Laxmi Paswan, the Superintending Engineer, National Highway Circle, Dehri-on-Sone, District- Rohtas.

6. Shri Firoj Khan, the Executive Engineer, National Highway, Gaya Division, District- Gaya

7. Shri Binay Kumar, the Special Officer (Traffic), Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.K. Sharma, A.C. to AAG-3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-03-2017 This Court by way of an interim order passed on 22nd of May, 2009 in C.W.J.C. No. 6486 of 2009 observed that pendency of the writ petition will not come in the way of the State in making the payment to the petitioner of its bill to the extent the amount due is admitted.

In the show-cause filed, it is pointed out that a sum of Rs. 36,68,347/- has been paid on 26th of May, 2011. In view of the said fact, the order dated 22nd of May,

Patna High Court MJC No.3892 of 2010 dt.02-03-2017 2/2 2009 stands complied with. No further order is required to be passed in the present Contempt Petition. If the petitioner has any other grievance, it may avail alternative remedies. The same is disposed of accordingly.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 07.03.2017 Transmission Date