← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2616/2015disposed

Arjun Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-16Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2616 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3127 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Arjun Singh son of Nathuni Singh, resident of village Bhavnathpur, Police Station- Nauhtta, District- Rohtas at Sasaram (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Chief Conservator of Forest Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Sandeep Kumar, the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram

5. Dr. Kumar Swamy, the Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

6. Dr. Kumar Swamy, the District Forest Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

7. Sri Lalan Mochi, the Ranger Officer, Sasaram Forest Area, Rohtas at Sasaram

8. Sri Lalan Mochi, the Ranger, Fasilpur Forest Area, Sasaram East Range, Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, S.C. 33 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 16-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The contempt application was filed complaining non compliance of the order passed in C.W.J.C.No.3127 of 2015 whereby the Secretary, Forest and Environment Department was directed to dispose of the revision of the petitioner. On non compliance of the order, that this application was filed. As show cause has been filed enclosing the order passed by the Secretary, Forest and Environment Department, dismissing the revision application. The petitioner complains of delay in

Patna High Court MJC No.2616 of 2015 (3) dt.16-12-2015 2/2 compliance.

Be that as it may, that the order has been finally passed on the revision application this contempt application is disposed of reserving liberty for the petitioner if so advised, to question the same before the appropriate form by filing an appropriate application. This contempt application stands disposed of. (Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U