Deepak Kumar @ Kuldeep @ Deepak Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23131 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-556 Year-2022 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== DEEPAK KUMAR @ KULDEEP @ DEEPAK RAY SON OF VINOD RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HARPUR ALLOTH, WARD NO. 7, PS- MUSRI GHARARI, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the F.I.R., this petitioner along with other accused persons under conspiracy committed the murder of the husband of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the FIR has been lodged against unknown and during the course of investigation it has come that on fateful day some hot talk took place between the deceased along with co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23131 of 2023(2) dt.26-06-2023 2/2 accused persons and co-accused persons left the place and on the way one Amit Rai @ Chhote Sarkar shot the deceased causing his death. The only material that has come agaisnt the petitioner is that he used to go and take wine in Kabari shop along with others. Except this, there is no other tangible evidence against the petitioner to show his complicity in the alleged crime. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the there is delay in lodging the F.I.R., let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Samastipur, in connection with Muffassil P.S. Case No. 556 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) sanjeev/- U T